rulint
← All Rulint Insights
Rulint Insights

Clarifying SAR Confidentiality in Customer Communications: OCC and Agencies’ Joint Statement

Source: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Source publication date: 2026-09-02
Editorial illustration for the article 'Clarifying SAR Confidentiality in Customer Communications: OCC and Agencies’ Joint Statement' about Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Executive Summary

On September 2, 2026, the OCC, alongside the Federal Reserve, FDIC, FinCEN, and NCUA, released a joint statement to clarify confidentiality requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act concerning Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). The guidance stresses that while SAR content and existence remain confidential, banks may communicate with customers about the underlying transactional facts without disclosing a SAR. This clarification is explicitly applicable to all community banks and aims to assist operational handling of customer communications in potentially fraudulent situations without violating SAR secrecy provisions.

Key Takeaways

  • The Bank Secrecy Act prohibits disclosing SAR contents or any information revealing SAR existence.
  • Banks can discuss underlying transactional facts, events, or documents associated with a SAR without breaching confidentiality rules.
  • Customer communications should be evaluated individually with caution to avoid revealing SAR existence.
  • The joint statement explicitly applies to all community banks.
  • Agencies provide examples of communications that typically do not compromise SAR confidentiality.
Analysis

Overview of the Joint Statement

On September 2, 2026, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) jointly released a statement addressing confidentiality considerations surrounding Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs), particularly the communication banks have with their customers when suspicious or potentially fraudulent transactions arise.

SAR Confidentiality Requirements Under the Bank Secrecy Act

The statement reiterates that the Bank Secrecy Act strictly prohibits any disclosure of a SAR or information that directly or indirectly reveals the existence of a SAR. This longstanding confidentiality obligation is critical to protect the effectiveness of SAR filings and investigations and to ensure cooperation from financial institutions without subjecting customers or subjects to undue disclosure risks.

Permissible Customer Communications

Importantly, the joint statement clarifies that communicating with customers about the underlying facts, transactions, or documents upon which a SAR is based does not inherently violate SAR confidentiality provisions. That is, banks are not precluded from discussing factual transactional information even if related to a suspicious activity, provided that they do not reveal that a SAR has been filed or exists.

Case-by-Case Assessment and Precautions

The guidance advises banks to consider customer communications on a case-by-case basis, exercising caution to avoid inadvertently disclosing the SAR’s existence. The agencies emphasize prudence in discussing information that could implicitly indicate a SAR has been filed.

Application to Community Banks

The statement explicitly notes that these confidentiality considerations and guidance apply to all community banks, extending clarity and ensuring these institutions understand their boundaries regarding SAR-related communications.

Examples of Non-Disclosive Communications

While not exhaustive, the statement includes a list of examples where customer communication typically would not reveal the existence of a SAR. These examples provide practical reference points to assist banks in navigating permissible dialogue with customers.

Contact and Further Resources

For additional information or questions, the statement directs institutions to contact the Compliance and Operational Risk Division of the OCC. The full statement is publicly available through the OCC bulletin page and related agency communications.

Primary Source

Independent Compliance Testing

Need to evaluate what this means for your testing program?

Rulint can translate applicable requirements into structured, evidence-based independent testing and defensible conclusions.

Discuss a Testing Need